Re: BGP Security Intelligence Platform – Feedback Requested

[Tom Beecher via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

I started to read through some of your docs.

Once I read that you believe as_path lengths 'influence credibility' , and
'shorter, consistent paths propagate more effectively' , I stopped.



On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 5:18 PM bogdancyber via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I’ve developed a tool called the BGP Security Intelligence Platform, which
> provides predictive routing-risk intelligence by analyzing origin-side ASN
> vulnerability and prefix-level structural risk across the global Internet.
>
> The platform continuously collects and processes live BGP control-plane
> data, RPKI validation, IRR records, CAIDA AS relationships, and
> multi-source prefix visibility measurements. Using this, it produces a
> ranked list of high-risk ASN–prefix combinations, highlighting where
> malformed or malicious announcements are most likely to propagate in
> practice.
>
> Key features and capabilities include:
> - Global ASN origin-side vulnerability scoring
> - Prefix structural risk analytics
> - Combined ASN–prefix risk ranking with ML-based classification
> - Real-world propagation and permissiveness modeling
> - Continuous intelligence generation for operators and security teams
> - Actionable outputs to prioritize filtering, mitigation, and
> routing-policy decisions
>
> The full article and partial excerpts from the tool are available here:
> https://zenodo.org/records/18407267 DOI:
> https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18407267
>
> **Note:** The Zenodo upload **does not include the full tool code**, only
> selected excerpts.
> Some data and parts of the code are extremely sensitive and cannot be made
> public.
> I am happy to share additional details privately upon request. Also, all
> files are copyrighted.
>
> I’m seeking feedback from experienced operators and engineers on:
> 1) Whether this tool would be useful in real-world BGP operations, does it
> have any value
> 2) Who in the community might benefit most from using it
> 3) Any suggestions for improvements or additional metrics to include (I
> was recommended to add ASPA and OTC in the future)
>
> Thank you very much for your time and insights.
>
> Best regards,
> Bogdan Pantelimon
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
>
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/B4DSCOS5MYZKESCFGTNMGXQGW67KKADC/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/MSS3L7MOEKQFR6VDO4XF6IA3OXQ7LFDX/