nanog mailing list archives
Re: Optimizing Singapore peering?
From: Tom Beecher via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 12:59:18 -0500
Always do your homework on who your transit providers connect with and where. Cheap transit is great, until it carries your bits everywhere except where you need them to go, The best thing to do in SG/APAC generally is to do a good analysis of where you need to get to first, then compare against the available providers to see where they connect to those destinations. It's not uncommon to need more than 1 provider to cover all the gaps. Interconnection in APAC is very fragmented , for a lot of reasons. On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 9:50 AM Landy Bible via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
Hey NANOG, I realize this is "NA" NOG list, but I assume I'm not the only one here who is operating a global network. Context: we have a dozen or so PoPs around the world to serve our load balancer product. We're using continent-specific prefixes to run anycast for this. We are on at least one IX at each location, and use Cogent as our primary transit provider. We'd like to add a real Tier 1 provider at each pop in the future, but In general, this all works ok right now. However, Singapore is a problem. We're on SGIX, but we're seeing a rather high percentage of traffic that originates in Singapore entering our Tokyo PoP instead. Google Cloud in particular is REALLY bad, with application latency testing approaching nearly 1 second, when our typical global latency is under 100ms on an end to end test. Other SG clouds are bad, but not THAT bad. My question to the list here is... for those of you who also operate in Singapore... what would you suggest we do to improve things here? We're looking at adding Arelion or NTT transit in APAC, but we're also trying to get PNIs (or even full IP transit) to the big Singapore networks like SingTel, SingNet, and StarHub, but we haven't had any luck yet. Perhaps we just don't know the right people.From a business perspective our primary concern is latency for our bigcustomers who are hosted on the clouds in the area, but I don't want to just ignore our other customers who aren't in the cloud. Based on my research thus far, my gut says getting transit from Arelion is probably my best "bang for buck" move, but I'm wondering if any of you have any insights or wisdom to share about Singapore or APAC in general. Thanks All, Landy AS62902 _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/7BRGQAGWBGFQOOJHV4ZVXVZZFPJHPKH2/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/4EPHCGU5SR5TGR54KWAKMHXMQRPU2ZYF/
Current thread:
- Optimizing Singapore peering? Landy Bible via NANOG (Jan 18)
- Re: Optimizing Singapore peering? Intergalactic Auditor via NANOG (Jan 18)
- Re: Optimizing Singapore peering? Jon Lewis via NANOG (Jan 18)
- Re: Optimizing Singapore peering? Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jan 18)
- Re: Optimizing Singapore peering? Barry Greene via NANOG (Jan 18)
- Re: Optimizing Singapore peering? James Bensley via NANOG (Jan 19)
