nanog mailing list archives
Re: pingability of 2600::
From: Brandon Martin via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:56:03 -0500
On 1/15/26 14:30, Marco Moock via NANOG wrote:
Hello! Cogent operates a machine on 2600::. IIRC there was also a route to sprint for that net, but that seems to be gone. I can ping that via my ISP (AS8820) that uses Cogent as its current default uplink. Although, I cannot ping that from various other ISPs, e.g. HE AS6939 or DTAG 3320 (no route). Some other people reported issues years ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/comments/1bzfqzn/2600_is_no_longer_pingable/ Do some people know more about that case?
Cogent is well known for having incomplete global IPv6 connectivity.Does your network have a route to 2600::? Does Cogent have a route to your network? If you're on AS6939, the answer to both of those is probably "no". Obviously in that case, you're not going to be able to ping it even if there's a host there listening and willing to respond.
Back when it was Sprint, the routing policy would have been different, but Cogent has completely absorbed the Sprint IP network and turned it into "more Cogent".
-- Brandon Martin _______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/43JSTLM6VC4QBKZW2IKRATD2KYTR5K2I/
Current thread:
- pingability of 2600:: Marco Moock via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Brandon Martin via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Marco Moock via NANOG (Jan 20)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Elmar K. Bins via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Randy Bush via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Elmar K. Bins via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Randy Bush via NANOG (Jan 15)
- RE: pingability of 2600:: Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Randy Bush via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Brandon Martin via NANOG (Jan 15)
