nanog mailing list archives

Re: pingability of 2600::

From: "Elmar K. Bins via NANOG" <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 22:34:08 +0100

nanog () lists nanog org (Marco Moock via NANOG) wrote:

Some other people reported issues years ago:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/comments/1bzfqzn/2600_is_no_longer_pingable/

Do some people know more about that case?


Cogent.

'nuff said.

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/IM36HJ36LAHALSUJP4OCCXIGNNPFENWS/

Current thread:

pingability of 2600:: Marco Moock via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Brandon Martin via NANOG (Jan 15)
  - Re: pingability of 2600:: Marco Moock via NANOG (Jan 20)
- Re: pingability of 2600:: Elmar K. Bins via NANOG (Jan 15)
  - Re: pingability of 2600:: Randy Bush via NANOG (Jan 15)
  - Re: pingability of 2600:: Elmar K. Bins via NANOG (Jan 15)
    - Re: pingability of 2600:: Randy Bush via NANOG (Jan 15)
    - RE: pingability of 2600:: Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jan 15)
    - Re: pingability of 2600:: Randy Bush via NANOG (Jan 15)